Re: ON EMPTY clause for aggregate and window functions
От
Robert Haas
Тема
Re: ON EMPTY clause for aggregate and window functions
Дата
Msg-id
CA+TgmoYfZW9y_T8A1nykRUcvJ2FQtMpBjgkq=+TCdq0-odF4=w@mail.gmail.com
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: ON EMPTY clause for aggregate and window functions Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: ON EMPTY clause for aggregate and window functions Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
Re: ON EMPTY clause for aggregate and window functions Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Sat, Sep 12, 2026 at 9:19 AM Jeevan Chalke wrote: > ON EMPTY is now implemented as exactly: > > agg(args, default ON EMPTY) == COALESCE(agg(args), default) > > for both plain and window aggregates: compute the aggregate's ordinary > result exactly as without ON EMPTY, and substitute the default only if that > result is NULL. No new expression-evaluation step, no per-row bookkeeping, > and no restriction on partial/parallel aggregation. This seems pretty useless -- the new syntax is more work for us to maintain, and doesn't really add any value over just using COALESCE. To be clear, I expect to lose this argument on the grounds that apparently this syntax is in the spec and therefore we ought to support it. But I don't understand why the spec -- or we -- should spend time inventing new ways to spell existing behaviors. That just seems confusing (and this particular choice of syntax seems extra-confusing). -- Robert Haas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Дата: