Re: BUG #19484: Segmentation fault triggered by FDW
От
Amit Langote
Тема
Re: BUG #19484: Segmentation fault triggered by FDW
Дата
Msg-id
CA+HiwqHjUO0uXFZ2dECJiNime6B1FDL5+mJ=XN+1XgzkY=m9DA@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: BUG #19484: Segmentation fault triggered by FDW (Amit Langote)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Add vacuum_delay_point() to GiST empty-page deletion pass Paul Kim <mok03127@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 10:09 PM Amit Langote wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 8:09 PM Matheus Alcantara > wrote: > > On Wed Jun 10, 2026 at 2:15 AM -03, Ayush Tiwari wrote: > > >> One minor naming observation: the new fdwPrivLists field in > > >> ModifyTableState doesn't follow the mt_ prefix convention used by the > > >> other re-indexed lists (mt_updateColnosLists, mt_mergeActionLists, > > >> mt_mergeJoinConditions). Should we rename it to mt_fdwPrivLists for > > >> consistency? > > >> > > > > > > I think yes, it makes sense to rename it. > > > > > > > Attached v2 renamed, thanks. > > > > (Also CC Amit on this since he committed cbc127917e0 which I believe > > that is when the issue started) > > Thanks for adding me. I'll take a look at this early next week. I looked, and the patch seems straightforward enough. Before committing it, I'd like to wait briefly to see if Fujita-san has any thoughts on the FDW-side concerns, since he has already chimed in on the thread. -- Thanks, Amit Langote
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата: