Re: beginners autovacuum question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Scott Marlowe
Тема
Re: beginners autovacuum question
Дата
Msg-id
AANLkTik8JL86JisXfD0b=M=dDYoxNCFig6+p--gsSThC@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
seg fault crashed the postmaster Gordon Shannon <gordo169@gmail.com>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Gordon Shannon <gordo169@gmail.com>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Gordon Shannon <gordo169@gmail.com>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Gordon Shannon <gordo169@gmail.com>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Gordon Shannon <gordo169@gmail.com>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Gordon Shannon <gordo169@gmail.com>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Gordon Shannon <gordo169@gmail.com>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Gordon Shannon <gordo169@gmail.com>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Gordon Shannon <gordo169@gmail.com>
beginners autovacuum question u235sentinel <u235sentinel@gmail.com>
Re: beginners autovacuum question Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
Re: beginners autovacuum question Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Gordon Shannon <gordo169@gmail.com>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: seg fault crashed the postmaster Gordon Shannon <gordo169@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:08 PM, u235sentinel  wrote:
> I'm tracking a problem with our tables being bloated and was curious if
> someone regularly kills autovacuum jobs, will autovacuum later reattempt to
> vacuum the table it was killed under?
>
> I've made autovacuum more aggressive and given more worker threads.  Yet for
> some reason we're not keeping up.

Can you show us what you've changed to make autovac more aggressive?

You might want to make sure you've lowered
autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay (mine's at 0 as we have 28 or so disks in
a single RAID-10 and lots of spare IO).  Also raise
autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit much higher (mine's at 5000).  Assuming
these tables get updated a lot, I'm gonna guess that you're not having
a problem with too high of threshold settings but with auto-vac
keeping up.  But it's just a guess.

Also, what do you get from things like iostat, vmstat, and sar as
regards your IO utilization and such?  If your IO system is always at
100% then more aggressive vacuuming isn't gonna do much, because
you'll always be behind.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Scott Marlowe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: linux server configuration
От: Bill Moran
Дата:
FAQ