Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 9788.1174960775@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> I have a question about what would happen for a transaction running a command
>> like COPY FROM. Is it possible it would manage to arrange to have no live
>> snapshots at all? So it would have no impact on concurrent VACUUMs? What about
>> something running a large pg_restore?
> Interesting idea.
Indeed. Currently, COPY forcibly sets a snapshot on the off chance
something will use it, but I could certainly see making that happen
"lazily", ie not at all in the simple case.
pg_restore is probably a lost cause, at least if you are running it
in single-transaction mode. I guess there'd be tradeoffs as to whether
to do that or not ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: