Re: additional json functionality

On Nov 17, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Josh Berkus  wrote:

> Jstore isn't the worst name suggestion I've heard on this thread.  The
> reason I prefer JSONB though, is that a new user looking for a place to
> put JSON data will clearly realize that JSON and JSONB are alternatives
> and related in some way.  They won't necessarily expect that "jstore"
> has anything to do with JSON, especially when there is another type
> called "JSON".  Quite a few people are liable to think it's something to
> do with Java.
> 
> Besides, we might get sued by these people: http://www.jstor.org/  ;-)

Okay, how about JDATE? ;-P

David