RE: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB

> Perhaps what you are talking about is at so low a level that it
> has no influence on these features...but if not then it might be 
> that the writer of a WAL will want to write an implementation of
> the storage manager that is well integrated with the WAL.

Yes, I would like to do this, if everyone agreed to wait for
7.2. Actually, I'm not sure if we're able to make both smgr
and WAL in 7.1

Vadim