Re: Optimising a two column OR check
| От | Andrew Gierth |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Optimising a two column OR check |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87imotx5uq.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Optimising a two column OR check (MichaelDBA <MichaelDBA@sqlexec.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
>>>>> "MichaelDBA" == MichaelDBA <MichaelDBA@sqlexec.com> writes: MichaelDBA> Yep, you're right, Andrew, adding a couple rows made it do MichaelDBA> the index only scan. I reckon I got misled by turning off MichaelDBA> sequential scans, thinking that actual rows were not MichaelDBA> important anymore. Overly simplistic reasonings can get MichaelDBA> one into trouble, lol. We do some odd stuff with the statistics estimates for completely empty tables because (a) it's not common in practice for a table to be always empty (i.e. the emptiness is usually transient) and (b) if you take the emptiness of a table at face value, you end up generating insanely bad plans for certain FK check queries that may not get replanned quickly enough to mitigate the performance impact. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: