Re: ISM shared memory on solaris
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: ISM shared memory on solaris
Дата
Msg-id
853.1067278484@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: [BUGS] ISM shared memory on solaris (Bruce Momjian)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
ISM shared memory on solaris Josh Wilmes <jwilmes@cisco.com>
Re: ISM shared memory on solaris Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: ISM shared memory on solaris Josh Wilmes <jwilmes@cisco.com>
Re: ISM shared memory on solaris Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: ISM shared memory on solaris Josh Wilmes <jwilmes@cisco.com>
Re: ISM shared memory on solaris Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: ISM shared memory on solaris Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: ISM shared memory on solaris Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: ISM shared memory on solaris Josh Wilmes <jwilmes@cisco.com>
Re: ISM shared memory on solaris Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian writes: > ! #if defined(sun) && defined(__sparc__) > /* use intimate shared memory on SPARC Solaris */ > memAddress = shmat(shmid, 0, SHM_SHARE_MMU); > #else I think this is going in the wrong direction. Why isn't the code just #if defined(SHM_SHARE_MMU) /* use intimate shared memory on Solaris */ memAddress = shmat(shmid, 0, SHM_SHARE_MMU); #else If the symbol is available I think we probably want to use it. It is an O/S issue, not a hardware issue, and so the test on __sparc__ seems quite wrongheaded ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления