Re: C11 / VS 2019
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: C11 / VS 2019
Дата
Msg-id
839151.1748959318@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: C11 / VS 2019 (Yura Sokolov)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
C11 / VS 2019 Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Re: C11 / VS 2019 Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: C11 / VS 2019 Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Re: C11 / VS 2019 David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: C11 / VS 2019 Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Re: C11 / VS 2019 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C11 / VS 2019 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C11 / VS 2019 David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: C11 / VS 2019 Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Re: C11 / VS 2019 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C11 / VS 2019 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: C11 / VS 2019 Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Yura Sokolov writes: > Will it mean we can implement atomics in term of C11 atomics? Any such change would have to be supported by extensive performance testing to verify that there's not a regression on any supported platform. Yeah, it'd be cool if we could rip out a lot of that code, but we aren't going to just rip on faith. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Andrei Lepikhov
Дата:
