Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
torikoshia
Тема
Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query
Дата
в 07:23:57
Msg-id
82f73973f6fbdb1d2ae31e7c40e4a4f1@oss.nttdata.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query Ekaterina Sokolova <e.sokolova@postgrespro.ru>
Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query Ekaterina Sokolova <e.sokolova@postgrespro.ru>
Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 11:35 PM Andrei Lepikhov  
wrote:
Thanks for your review!

> 2. GetCurrentQueryDesc, SetCurrentQueryDesc - need 'extern' in the .h 
> file
> 3. ExplainPrintPlan, ExplainPrintTriggers - have exact duplicates in 
> the explain.h
> 4. ExplainStringAssemble() has '0' input for a boolean parameter.
> 5. ExecSetExecProcNodeRecurse: I don't see PlanState::initPlan. Is this 
> intentional?
> 6. INJECTION_POINT("log-query-interrupt", ...) - it is called inside a
> signal-safe zone. In tests, the caller might do a lot of things in the 
> attached
> routine, causing hidden problems later.

I agree that these points should be addressed.
I'll post an updated patch.

I've also received some off-list feedback, and I'm planning to 
incorporate
those comments into the updated patch as well.


On 2026-06-26 21:50, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 6:33 AM Andrei Lepikhov  
> wrote:
>> Ok, so just mention this behaviour in the documentation - let people 
>> know that
>> they should potentially wait for a minute or two more to see the 
>> EXPLAIN.
>> Real-life with huge queries and big machines provide us with examples 
>> where a
>> backend might delay a response to a signal for quite a substantial 
>> time.
>> 
>> Sometimes nothing happens after such an async operation, and we need 
>> to identify
>> the problem: has the backend stalled, is the ‘logging plan’ algorithm
>> ineffective, or is something else happening?
> 
> I don't think we document this in other, similar cases. Many things
> can be delayed if the machine is overloaded, but unless I am missing
> something, having to wait over a minute for this to work would be
> *extremely* unusual and only happen in case of a machine that is
> absolutely being crushed by the load. And in that case everything else
> will be slow, too.

I think a delay caused by signal handling can also occur with the 
existing
functions, such as pg_cancel_backend() and 
pg_log_backend_memory_contexts().

Since the documentation does not specifically mention such delays for 
those
functions, I thought it may not be necessary to document this point for
pg_log_query_plan() either.


On the other hand, since pg_log_query_plan() emits the log output at the
next time ExecProcNodeFirst() is executed, if there is a delay before
ExecProcNodeFirst() is called, there would also be a delay before the
plan is logged.

For example, this can happen with a query such as SELECT pg_sleep(100),
or when executing a time-consuming sort operation like the following:

   BEGIN;
   DECLARE sort_probe NO SCROLL CURSOR FOR
   SELECT g, md5(g::text) AS k
   FROM generate_series(1, 100000000) AS g
   ORDER BY k;

   FETCH 1 FROM sort_probe;

I think this behavior is specific to pg_log_query_plan(), so I am
starting to wonder whether something should be mentioned in the
documentation.


Thanks,

--
Atsushi Torikoshi
Seconded from NTT DATA CORPORATION to SRA OSS K.K.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Peter Smith
Дата:
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
FAQ