Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction
Дата
Msg-id
8034.1583699444@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
I wrote: > I've just finished scanning the source code and concluding that all > of these functions are similarly broken: > pg_ls_dir > pg_ls_dir_files > pg_tablespace_databases > pg_logdir_ls_internal > pg_timezone_names > pgrowlocks BTW, another thing I noticed while looking around is that some of the functions using SRF_RETURN_DONE() think they should clean up memory beforehand. This is a waste of code/cycles, as long as the memory was properly allocated in funcctx->multi_call_memory_ctx, because funcapi.c takes care of deleting that context. We should probably document that *any* manual cleanup before SRF_RETURN_DONE() is an antipattern. If you have to have cleanup, it needs to be done via RegisterExprContextCallback instead. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От: Thomas Munro
Дата: