Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon)
От
Erik Jones
Тема
Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon)
Дата
Msg-id
7AF68F09-CB06-4C6C-BA75-2DA3B6157F16@myemma.com
Ответ на
Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon) (Joshua D. Drake)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Slony-I for upgrades - was Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon) Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
Re: Slony-I for upgrades - was Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon) Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>
On Apr 18, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:59:34 -0400 > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> I find it pretty unlikely that Slony would be unable to help you >> upgrade here. Obviously you can upgrade one database at a time. >> >> Also, mostly it's not the database size what's a concern, but rather >> the size of the largest table. > > As I recall (I could be wrong) Slony syncs the whole set as a single > transaction. So if he has his entire database as a set he may > have a problem regardless of the largest or smallest table. I would > also > agree that 30 million rows is likely not a problem but he should still > check his velocity. FWIW, Londiste doesn't work with sets and, instead, maintains replication state, as well as giving you the option to add/remove tables from replication, on a table-by-table which can be observed from the command line. Erik Jones DBA | Emma® erik@myemma.com 800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888 615.292.0777 (fax) Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style. Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Chris Browne
Дата: