Re: BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single ROW argument
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single ROW argument
Дата
Msg-id
7547.1392745766@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single
ROW argument (Joshua Yanovski)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single ROW argument pythonesque@gmail.com
Re: BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single ROW argument Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single
ROW argument Joshua Yanovski <pythonesque@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single
ROW argument Joshua Yanovski <pythonesque@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single
ROW argument Joshua Yanovski <pythonesque@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single ROW argument Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single
ROW argument Joshua Yanovski <pythonesque@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single ROW argument Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single ROW argument Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single
ROW argument Joshua Yanovski <pythonesque@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single ROW argument Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single
ROW argument Joshua Yanovski <pythonesque@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #9227: Error on SELECT ROW OVERLAPS ROW with single ROW argument Joshua Yanovski <pythonesque@gmail.com>
Joshua Yanovski writes: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> While it would be a reasonably simple change to make this work as >> originally intended, I'm strongly tempted to just rip it out instead, >> and only support the SQL-mandated syntax. If anyone was using this >> undocumented feature, you'd think they'd have complained sometime in >> the last ten years. And making it work would really entail adding >> documentation and a regression test case, so it'd be substantially >> more effort than just killing the "list_length == 1" case. > Attaching a patch to just remove the n == 1 case. It occurred to me that there's an additional reason not to make the code work like Lockhart seems to have envisioned: if it did duplicate the argument like that, that'd lead to double evaluation of any volatile function that's present in the argument. So I've gone ahead and committed this, along with some further fooling around to make the error messages nicer. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Francisco Olarte
Дата:
От: Joshua Yanovski
Дата: