Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Andrew Dunstan
Тема
Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU
Дата
Msg-id
6af1ac53-c458-0e63-4d2d-ae77751d4340@dunslane.net
Ответ на
Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU (Andres Freund)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
cpluspluscheck vs ICU Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> 

On 3/22/22 22:23, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-03-22 17:20:24 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I was about to propose adding headerscheck / cpluspluscheck to the CI file so
>> that cfbot can catch future issues.
> The attached patch does so, with ICU disabled to avoid the problems discussed
> in the thread. Example run:
> https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6326161696358400?logs=headers_headerscheck#L0
>
> Unless somebody sees a reason not to, I'm planning to commit this soon.
>

That only helps when running the CI/cfbot setup. Fixing it for other
(manual or buildfarm) users would be nice. Luckily crake isn't building
with ICU.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
FAQ