Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Josh Berkus
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Дата
Msg-id
69b3ee85-50c6-c2f3-3501-b7a10e0b3b99@berkus.org
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
On 08/22/2017 11:04 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> WARNING:  what you did is ok, but you might have wanted to do something else
> 
> First of all, whether or not that can properly be called a warning is
> highly debatable.  Also, if you do that sort of thing to your spouse
> and/or children, they call it "nagging".  I don't think users will
> like it any more than family members do.

Realistically, we'll support the backwards-compatible syntax for 3-5
years.  Which is fine.

I suggest that we just gradually deprecate the old syntax from the docs,
and then around Postgres 16 eliminate it.  I posit that that's better
than changing the meaning of the old syntax out from under people.

-- 
Josh Berkus
Containers & Databases Oh My!


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Serge Rielau
Дата:
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
FAQ