Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
От
Josh Berkus
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Дата
Msg-id
69b3ee85-50c6-c2f3-3501-b7a10e0b3b99@berkus.org
Ответ на
Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. (Masahiko Sawada)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
On 08/22/2017 11:04 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > WARNING: what you did is ok, but you might have wanted to do something else > > First of all, whether or not that can properly be called a warning is > highly debatable. Also, if you do that sort of thing to your spouse > and/or children, they call it "nagging". I don't think users will > like it any more than family members do. Realistically, we'll support the backwards-compatible syntax for 3-5 years. Which is fine. I suggest that we just gradually deprecate the old syntax from the docs, and then around Postgres 16 eliminate it. I posit that that's better than changing the meaning of the old syntax out from under people. -- Josh Berkus Containers & Databases Oh My!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления