RE: 2 computers 1hd 2 postgres daemons. Is it possib le?]
От | Clark, Joel |
---|---|
Тема | RE: 2 computers 1hd 2 postgres daemons. Is it possib le?] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 69F195289743D411B428009027E293C401290E84@CLTEXCH1 обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
As long as the requirement is only fail-over and not load-balancing, it *might* be doable...but running against tables mounted across NFS will still be slow, relatively speaking... jc -----Original Message----- From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 3:54 PM To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] 2 computers 1hd 2 postgres daemons. Is it possible?] Granted it probably not the most efficient solution, but if it is something that is really a problem... what about having your dual server, one data source setup, but the second server is idle and does nothing and only kicks in if the primary drops? Might be more complicated to setup than it sounds and there still would be a time delay for the second to pick up, but it technically would eliminate the two servers butting heads. Again though, not very efficient solution... unless it is very critical and money is no object. :) Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Shraibman" <jks@selectacast.net> To: <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 2:53 PM Subject: [Fwd: [INTERFACES] 2 computers 1hd 2 postgres daemons. Is it possible?] > > -- > Joseph Shraibman > jks@selectacast.net > Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: