Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
От
Jim Nasby
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Дата
Msg-id
59b88df7-01f8-03ca-a212-2de7ade9ca34@BlueTreble.com
Ответ на
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? (Tomas Vondra)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
On 2/24/17 12:30 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > In any case, we can't just build x86-64 packages with compile-time > SSE4.1 checks. Dumb question... since we're already discussing llvm for the executor, would that potentially be an option here? AIUI that also opens the possibility of using the GPU as well. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
