Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Дата
Msg-id 59b88df7-01f8-03ca-a212-2de7ade9ca34@BlueTreble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2/24/17 12:30 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> In any case, we can't just build x86-64 packages with compile-time
> SSE4.1 checks.

Dumb question... since we're already discussing llvm for the executor, 
would that potentially be an option here? AIUI that also opens the 
possibility of using the GPU as well.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums