[re-adding commiters which I inadvertently left off]
On 09/30/2017 06:10 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>
>
>> I was just looking at this. Why aren't we using "pg_ctl kill" to
>> terminate the backend? That's supposed to be portable.
> Because pg_ctl can't do that for any process but postmaster, no? The
> test is supposed to find issues with backend death (and has
> defficiencies in error reporting already, and would have caught a bug
> I'd introduced previously).
>
No, I don't think so. That's not what the docs say. That's why you give
it a pid argument" "pg_ctl kill signal_name process_id"
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers