Re: Consistently use palloc_object() and palloc_array()

Michael Paquier  writes:
> It may be a good idea to split the patch into two parts, at least:
> - One for the bulk of the changes, for the straight-forward changes.
> Most of what you are suggesting are that for palloc_object and
> palloc_array which are dropped-in replacements.  Checking that these
> assemble the same before and after offers one extra layer of
> confidence.
> - Second one for the more dubious changes.

Yeah, I was thinking the same.  Some of those might perhaps be bugs
that we want to back-patch, so they need to be looked at in a
different way.

			regards, tom lane