Re: Statistical aggregate functions are not working with PARTIAL aggregation
От
Andres Freund
Тема
Re: Statistical aggregate functions are not working with PARTIAL aggregation
Дата
Msg-id
50AC73BA-F4BE-4F06-A5E6-C8CD7A28B979@anarazel.de
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Statistical aggregate functions are not working with partitionwise aggregate Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Statistical aggregate functions are not working withpartitionwise aggregate Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>
Statistical aggregate functions are not working with PARTIAL aggregation Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Statistical aggregate functions are not working with PARTIALaggregation Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Hi, On May 20, 2019 6:23:46 AM PDT, Robert Haas wrote: >On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 2:36 PM Andres Freund >wrote: >> Not sure I understand the distinction you're trying to make with the >> variable renaming. The combine function is also a transition >function, >> no? > >Not in my mental model. It's true that a combine function is used in >a similar manner to a transition function, but they are not the same >thing. Well, the context here is precisely that. We're still calling functions that have trans* in the name, we pass them transfn style named parameters. If you read my suggestion, it essentially is running go *further* than David's renaming? Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Dean Rasheed
Дата: