Re: Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by default?
От
Kevin Grittner
Тема
Re: Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by
default?
Дата
Msg-id
4E8EEA800200002500041BA3@gw.wicourts.gov
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by default? Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by default? Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by default? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by
default? "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by default? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by
default? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by default? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by
default? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by default? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by default? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Robert Haas wrote: > The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of these months > about how convenient it is that we defined WAL_DEBUG in debug > builds IMO, --enable-debug should not do anything but include debugging symbols. The ability to get a useful stack trace from a production crash, without compromising performance, is just too important by itself to consider conditioning any other behavior on it. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Alex Hunsaker
Дата:
От: Robert Haas
Дата: