Re: Preventing OOM kills

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
John R Pierce
Тема
Re: Preventing OOM kills
Дата
в 22:01:45
Msg-id
4DDC54EB.1020104@hogranch.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Preventing OOM kills Yang Zhang <yanghatespam@gmail.com>
Re: Preventing OOM kills Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
Re: Preventing OOM kills Andrej <andrej.groups@gmail.com>
Re: Preventing OOM kills John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>
Re: Preventing OOM kills Marco Colombo <pgsql@esiway.net>
Re: Preventing OOM kills Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: Preventing OOM kills Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
On 05/24/11 5:50 PM, Andrej wrote:
> Add more RAM?  Look at tunables for other processes on
> the machine?  At the end of the day making the kernel shoot
> anything out of despair shouldn't be the done thing.

somehow, 'real' unix has neither a OOMkiller nor does it flat out die 
under heavy loads, it just degrades gracefully.  I've seen Solaris and 
AIX and BSD servers happily chugging along with load factors in the 
100s, significant portions of memory paging, etc, without completely 
crumbling to a halt.    Soimetimes I wonder why Linux even pretends to 
support virtual memory, as you sure don't want it to be paging.


-- 
john r pierce                            N 37, W 123
santa cruz ca                         mid-left coast

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Preventing OOM kills
От: Tim Uckun
Дата:
FAQ