On May 22, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> It seems probably workable given that we expect the pending list to be
> of fairly constrained size. However, the commit message referenced
> upthread also muttered darkly about GIN's partial match logic not working
> in amgettuple. I do not recall the details of that issue, but unless we
> can solve that one too, there's not much use in fixing this one.
Well, what about a GiST operator family/class for arrays?
Best,
David