Re: Performance under contention
| От | Kevin Grittner |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Performance under contention |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4CEA58430200002500037D06@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Performance under contention (Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Performance under contention
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: > It looks like a hack Not to everyone. In the referenced section, Hellerstein, Stonebraker and Hamilton say: "any good multi-user system has an admission control policy" In the case of PostgreSQL I understand the counter-argument, although I'm inclined to think that it's prudent for a product to limit resource usage to a level at which it can still function well, even if there's an external solution which can also work, should people use it correctly. It seems likely that a mature admission control policy could do a better job of managing some resources than an external product could. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: