Re: BUG #4849: intermittent future timestamps
От
Kevin Grittner
Тема
Re: BUG #4849: intermittent future timestamps
Дата
Msg-id
4A2FAE7E0200002500027807@gw.wicourts.gov
Ответ на
Re: BUG #4849: intermittent future timestamps (David Leppik)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
BUG #4849: intermittent future timestamps "David Leppik" <dleppik@vocalabs.com>
Re: BUG #4849: intermittent future timestamps Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #4849: intermittent future timestamps David Leppik <dleppik@vocalabs.com>
Re: BUG #4849: intermittent future timestamps "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: BUG #4849: intermittent future timestamps David Leppik <dleppik@vocalabs.com>
David Leppik wrote: > Never mind. Turns out the bug was in our own code (read: me, > personally, being stupid) to convert a java.sql.Timestamp to > java.sql.Date. Why it works at all in MySQL... I don't even want > to know. java.sql.Date or java.util.Date? (You don't show your imports, so it's impossible to tell from the code snippet.) If it's java.util.Date, I can't immediately see why your errors would be greater than one second. If it's java.sql.Date, you're probably in territory where the behavior is undefined, but it's hard to see where you would get the results you showed. Perhaps there's an opportunity for us to make the PostgreSQL JDBC driver behave more sanely in this circumstance? > Why is it we can spend weeks looking at a bug, and we can't find > it until we decide to blame it on someone else? It's probably a corollary to the tendency to see our own gaffs when reading the post coming back from the list much more clearly than they appeared before clicking "send". :-/ -Kevin
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления