Re: unnest multirange, returned order

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Laurenz Albe
Тема
Re: unnest multirange, returned order
Дата
Msg-id
47e801481db9947c4a597575ad45e1c6304130ca.camel@cybertec.at
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
unnest multirange, returned order PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
Re: unnest multirange, returned order Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Re: unnest multirange, returned order Daniel Fredouille <daniel.fredouille@gmail.com>
Re: unnest multirange, returned order Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Re: unnest multirange, returned order Daniel Fredouille <daniel.fredouille@gmail.com>
Re: unnest multirange, returned order Daniel Fredouille <daniel.fredouille@gmail.com>
Re: unnest multirange, returned order Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Re: unnest multirange, returned order Daniel Fredouille <daniel.fredouille@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 20:40 -0400, Daniel Fredouille wrote:
> > I'd say that the storag order is the order in which PostgreSQL stores
> > multiranges internally:
> 
> Right, I believe that you are right but then this information is not useful for the developer. 
> If storage order is always ascending by range order then let's make it clear,
> if order cannot be counted upon as it may evolve from postgres version to version,
> then let's make it clear as well. WDYT ?

I personally think that it is clear as it is written now.

If you have a good suggestion for an improvement, you could send it;
perhaps someone will pick it up.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe


В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления
От: Daniel Fredouille
Дата:
От: PG Doc comments form
Дата:
FAQ