Re: BUG #12694: crash if the number of result rows is lower than gin_fuzzy_search_limit

Heikki Linnakangas  writes:
> The fix is simple: make sure that startScanKey() is always called, by 
> getting rid of the early return above. Attached. I'll apply this later 
> today or tomorrow unless someone sees a problem with this.

Another, even simpler fix would be to just move the startScanKey()
call loop to before the "if (GinFuzzySearchLimit > 0)" block.
Is there a particular reason why it's a good idea to do things in
the current order?  It almost looks like a patch application error
as it stands.

With either fix, I concur that we should back-patch it.  It's not at all
clear how come older branches don't fail because of this.

			regards, tom lane