Re: Supartitions in PGSQL 10
От
Thomas Kellerer
Тема
Re: Supartitions in PGSQL 10
Дата
Msg-id
45e742f4-c516-08c6-7351-ca26e516085a@gmx.net
Ответ на
Supartitions in PGSQL 10 (Kumar, Virendra)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Supartitions in PGSQL 10 "Kumar, Virendra" <Virendra.Kumar@guycarp.com>
Re: Supartitions in PGSQL 10 Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
RES: Supartitions in PGSQL 10 Márcio A. Sepp <marcio@zyontecnologia.com.br>
Re: Supartitions in PGSQL 10 Andrew Staller <andrew@timescale.com>
Kumar, Virendra schrieb am 08.01.2018 um 22:12:
> Can you please let us know if Sub-partitions are supported in PGSQL
> (declarative partitions) 10.1. If yes can it be list-list partitions.
> We have a situation where a table is very big having around 2 billion
> rows and is growing. We want to use partitions but not sure if
> sub-partitions are available. The partition key we are looking for is
> having around 8000 different values so it will be 8000 partitions and
> I think that number is really too big number of partitions. For your
> information RDBMS is not yet Postgres, we are evaluating it to see if
> it can support.
Quote from the manual: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/ddl-partitioning.html#DDL-PARTITIONING-DECLARATIVE
Partitions may themselves be defined as partitioned tables, using what is called sub-partitioning
Thomas
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления