Re: [HACKERS] SESSION_USER
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] SESSION_USER
Дата
Msg-id
4562.955747814@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
SESSION_USER (Bruce Momjian)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
SESSION_USER Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] SESSION_USER Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Re: [HACKERS] SESSION_USER Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Re: [HACKERS] SESSION_USER Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Re: [HACKERS] SESSION_USER Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Re: [HACKERS] SESSION_USER Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian writes: > create_table.sgml mentions SESSION_USER is not supported. I don't think > that is true anymore, is it? regression=# select session_user; getpgusername --------------- postgres (1 row) Looking at the spec, we do seem to be missing SYSTEM_USER out of the four variants the spec mentions. However, considering that we map them all to the same thing anyway, I can't get too excited about it. If something is done about making functions have setuid-like behavior, we'd want to make sure that the appropriate ones of these functions change value inside a function. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления