Re: Error handling in plperl and pltcl

Jan Wieck wrote:

> This all would mean that however deeply nested a function call tree, 
> it would unwind and rollback everything up to the outermost catch. If 
> there is no catch used, no subtransactions are created and the 
> unwinding goes all the way up to the statement. If catch is used but 
> no spi access performed inside, no subtransaction overhead either.

Yes, this makes a lot of sense. No overhead unless you want to. Way to go.

I wish I could do the same in PL/Java.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren