Jan Wieck wrote:
> This all would mean that however deeply nested a function call tree,
> it would unwind and rollback everything up to the outermost catch. If
> there is no catch used, no subtransactions are created and the
> unwinding goes all the way up to the statement. If catch is used but
> no spi access performed inside, no subtransaction overhead either.
Yes, this makes a lot of sense. No overhead unless you want to. Way to go.
I wish I could do the same in PL/Java.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren