Re: VACUUM DELAY
От
Gaetano Mendola
Тема
Re: VACUUM DELAY
Дата
Msg-id
4117B230.1050307@bigfoot.com
Ответ на
Re: VACUUM DELAY (Jan Wieck)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
VACUUM DELAY Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: VACUUM DELAY "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe@qwest.net>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Jan Wieck wrote: > On 8/9/2004 7:19 AM, Gaetano Mendola wrote: > >> Hi all, >> I have seen the big debat about to have the delay >> off or on by default. >> >> Why not enable it by default and introduce a new >> parameter to vacuum command itself ? Something like: >> >> >> VACUUM .... WITH DELAY 100; > > > It's not just one parameter to tune here. It is a set of parameters that > all together need to be viewed as a whole. The slowdown will be affected > by the other parameters as well, so turning the millisecond knob only is > not even half of the story. So the other parameter will inserted in the new sintax too, I think is fundamental the ability of override this values during the vacuum call: VACUUM .... WITH DELAY 100 [ .... ]; Regards Gaetano Mendola
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления