Re: VACUUM DELAY

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Gaetano Mendola
Тема
Re: VACUUM DELAY
Дата
Msg-id
4117B230.1050307@bigfoot.com
Ответ на
Re: VACUUM DELAY (Jan Wieck)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
VACUUM DELAY Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: VACUUM DELAY "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe@qwest.net>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Re: VACUUM DELAY Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Jan Wieck wrote:

> On 8/9/2004 7:19 AM, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> I have seen the big debat about to have the delay
>> off or on by default.
>>
>> Why not enable it by default and introduce a new
>> parameter to vacuum command itself ? Something like:
>>
>>
>> VACUUM .... WITH DELAY 100;
> 
> 
> It's not just one parameter to tune here. It is a set of parameters that 
> all together need to be viewed as a whole. The slowdown will be affected 
> by the other parameters as well, so turning the millisecond knob only is 
> not even half of the story.

So the other parameter will inserted in the new sintax too, I think is fundamental
the ability of override this values during the vacuum call:

VACUUM .... WITH DELAY 100 [ .... ];



Regards
Gaetano Mendola




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: James William Pye
Дата:
От: James William Pye
Дата:
FAQ