Re: correlated delete with "in" and "left outer join"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Mike Mascari
Тема
Re: correlated delete with "in" and "left outer join"
Дата
Msg-id
403EE79E.6010001@mascari.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
correlated delete with "in" and "left outer join" <mike@linkify.com>
Re: correlated delete with "in" and "left outer join" Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>
Re: correlated delete with "in" and "left outer join" Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>
Re: correlated delete with "in" and "left outer join" Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>
Re: correlated delete with 'in' and 'left outer join' <mike@linkify.com>
Re: correlated delete with 'in' and 'left outer join' Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>
Re: correlated delete with 'in' and 'left outer join' Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>
Re: correlated delete with 'in' and 'left outer join' Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>
Re: correlated delete with 'in' and 'left outer join' Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>
Re: correlated delete with 'in' and 'left outer join' Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>
Re: correlated delete with 'in' and 'left outer join' Michael Chaney <mdchaney@michaelchaney.com>
Re: correlated delete with 'in' and 'left outer join' Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>
Re: correlated delete with 'in' and 'left outer join' Michael Chaney <mdchaney@michaelchaney.com>
Re: correlated delete with "in" and "left outer join" Michael Chaney <mdchaney@michaelchaney.com>
Re: correlated delete with "in" and "left outer join" Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>
Stephan Szabo wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 mike@linkify.com wrote:
> 
> 
>>I'm using postgresl 7.3.2 and have a query that executes very slowly.
>>
>>There are 2 tables: Item and LogEvent.  ItemID (an int4) is the primary key
>>of Item, and is also a field in LogEvent.  Some ItemIDs in LogEvent do not
>>correspond to ItemIDs in Item, and periodically we need to purge the
>>non-matching ItemIDs from LogEvent.
>>
>>The query is:
>>
>>delete from LogEvent where EventType != 'i' and ItemID in
>>(select distinct e.ItemID from LogEvent e left outer join Item i
>>on e.ItemID = i.ItemID where e.EventType != 'i' and i.ItemID is null);
>>
>>I understand that using "in" is not very efficient.
>>
>>Is there some other way to write this query without the "in"?
> 
> 
> Perhaps
> delete from LogEvent where EventType != 'i' and not exists
>  (select * from Item i where i.ItemID=LogEvent.ItemID);

Maybe I'm not reading his subquery correctly, but the left outer 
join will produce a row from LogEvent regardless of whether or not a 
matching row exists in Item, correct? So doesn't it reduce to:

DELETE FROM LogEvent WHERE EventType <> 'i';

???

Mike Mascari


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Jim Crate
Дата:
От: Mike Mascari
Дата:
FAQ