Re: JDBC 3.0 support?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Hanasaki JiJi
Тема
Re: JDBC 3.0 support?
Дата
в 23:14:05
Msg-id
3EB879E5.5000207@hanaden.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
JDBC 3.0 support? Hanasaki JiJi <hanasaki@hanaden.com>
Re: JDBC 3.0 support? Barry Lind <blind@xythos.com>
Re: JDBC 3.0 support? Hanasaki JiJi <hanasaki@hanaden.com>
Re: JDBC 3.0 support? Barry Lind <blind@xythos.com>
Re: JDBC 3.0 support? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: JDBC 3.0 support? Barry Lind <blind@xythos.com>
Re: JDBC 3.0 support? Hanasaki JiJi <hanasaki@hanaden.com>
Re: JDBC 3.0 support? Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net>
Any suggestions for architecture/implemenation in the following situation:?
	- insert a new row
	- primary key is an autoinc / sequence column
	- no other column is sure to be unique
	- need to continue working with the data of the row
		after the insert and possibly do an update

Barry Lind wrote:
> Hanasaki,
> 
> The driver is already 3.0 compliant for that.  It correctly returns 
> false to DatabaseMetaData.supportsGetGeneratedKeys() indicating that 
> postgresql does not support this functionality.  This isn't likely to 
> change unless some significant new functionality is introduced in the 
> server to do this.  There isn't really anything the driver can do here 
> since the functionality doesn't exist in the database to automatically 
> return this information.
> 
> thanks,
> --Barry
> 

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления
От: Barry Lind
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Memroy leak with jdbc
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JDBC 3.0 support?
FAQ