At 13:16 30/03/01 +0900, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>Philip Warner wrote:
>>
>> At 19:14 29/03/01 -0800, Mikheev, Vadim wrote:
>> >> >Reported problem is caused by bug (only one tuple version must be
>> >> >returned by SELECT) and this is way to fix it.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> I assume this is not possible in 7.1?
>> >
>> >Just looked in heapam.c - I can fix it in two hours.
>> >The question is - should we do this now?
>> >Comments?
>>
>> It's a bug; how confident are you of the fix?
>>
>
>I doubt if it's a bug of SELECT.
No idea where the bug is, but SELECT should never return two versions of
the *same* row.
>'Well what
>'concurrent UPDATE then SELECT FOR UPDATE +
>SELECT' return ?
No idea, maybe Vadim or Tom can help?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/