Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open

At 10:54 11/10/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Philip Warner  writes:
>> Any chance of showing if anything has been updated in the TX?
>
>Hmm ... SharedBufferChanged would probably do as a proxy for that ...
>not sure if it's a good idea though.

The idea was to indicate if the process is likely to be causing a locking
problem - but now I think about it, a more useful pice of information would
be if any tables/rows/whatever are locked in such a way that another user
might be prevented from doing an update. Is this possible?

I would maintain that if possible, it is useful to distinguish logical
'read-only' transactions from TXs that might lock another user.


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|
                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/