Re: Incorrect version number given to sync_pgdata() in pg_combinebackup.c
От | Chao Li |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Incorrect version number given to sync_pgdata() in pg_combinebackup.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2CB80E4D-9E58-4252-B83C-86562AA7A89B@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Incorrect version number given to sync_pgdata() in pg_combinebackup.c (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Incorrect version number given to sync_pgdata() in pg_combinebackup.c
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Oct 10, 2025, at 14:21, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:Hi all,
While hacking on a different thing that touched pg_combinebackup, I
have bumped into a silly bug.
To keep it short, the version number is calculated based on this code
in read_pg_version_file(), where "version" is the result of strtoul()
applied to the contents of PG_VERSION:
return version * 10000;
For v18, this would return 180000, which is fine.
A bit later on, we do that, which is not fine:
sync_pgdata(opt.output, version * 10000, opt.sync_method, true);
This leads to a version number higher than expected, multiplied twice.
This was harmless, because sync_pgdata uses the version number to make
the difference between pg_wal/ and pg_xlog/, and pg_combinebackup does
not support versions older than v10, which is exactly where the
renamed happened. Hence, even if the version number was too high, we
always expect to flush pg_wal/.
Trivial patch attached, for a backpatch down to where pg_combinebackup
has been introduced.
Thoughts?
--
Michael
<pg_combinebackup-version.patch>
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: