Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Florian Pflug
Тема
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)
Дата
Msg-id
2C70B563-6562-425C-9C53-F36E39F7ACC4@phlo.org
Ответ на
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) (Dean Rasheed)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) Nicolas Barbier <nicolas.barbier@gmail.com> 

> On 04.04.2014, at 09:40, Dean Rasheed  wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure how much additional work is required to sort this out,
> but to me it looks more realistic to target 9.5 than 9.4, so at this
> point I tend to think that the patch ought to be marked as returned
> with feedback.

I think the patch is worthwhile, even without this additional optimization. In fact, If the optimization was part of the patch, there would probably be calls to factor it out, on the ground that the patch is already rather large.

I don't see what bumping the whole thing to 9.5 buys, compared do applying what we have now, and optimizing in 9.5 further.

best regards,
Florian Pflug

PS: Sorry for the broken mail I sent earlier - miss-touched on my Phone ;-(
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
Предыдущее
От: Florian Pflug
Дата:
Следующее
От: yamt@netbsd.org (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
Дата:
FAQ