Re: Consistent \d commands in psql
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql
Дата
Msg-id
28526.1206978259@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql (Gregory Stark)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Consistent \d commands in psql Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql "Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql "Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql "Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql "Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>
Re: Consistent \d commands in psql "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
Gregory Stark writes: > One --perhaps nice, perhaps not-- property of this is that if you defined a > function named "rtrim" and then did "\df rtrim" it would show you _both_ the > system and user function and make it easier to see the conflict. Whereas the > other behaviour I proposed would hide the system function which might > exacerbate the user's confusion. Yeah, that is a very good point indeed. Another way we could approach this is \df -> all functions \dfS -> sys functions only \dfU -> user functions only which avoids falling into the trap Greg mentions. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления