Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions
Дата
в 17:22:19
Msg-id
27924.1526912539@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical setfunctions Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Peter Eisentraut  writes:
> On 10/13/17 19:01, Tom Lane wrote:
> SMODIFY = SHARABLE    ffunc does some one-time change like sorting,
> so state merging is OK but not window agg

> Is "sharable" the preferred spelling, as opposed to "shareable"?

Hmm ... I looked in two different dictionaries, and they both say
sharable is a variant of shareable.  So while it's not wrong exactly,
I seem to have picked the less preferred spelling.

I could run around and change it, but I'd have to do so *right now*
I think --- once we release beta1 the costs of changing this would
go up.

Will do so if there's not objections in an hour or so.

			regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_basebackup -k option
FAQ