Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Nathan Bossart
Тема
Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier
Дата
Msg-id
20230816200715.GB2908487@nathanxps13
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier Michail Nikolaev <michail.nikolaev@gmail.com>
Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier Michail Nikolaev <michail.nikolaev@gmail.com>
Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier Michail Nikolaev <michail.nikolaev@gmail.com>
Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier Michail Nikolaev <michail.nikolaev@gmail.com>
Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier Michail Nikolaev <michail.nikolaev@gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:29:10PM +0200, Michail Nikolaev wrote:
> As answer: probably we need to change
> "If we know that we're holding ProcArrayLock exclusively, we don't
> need the read barrier."
> to
> "If we're removing xid, we don't need the read barrier because only
> the startup process can remove and add xids to KnownAssignedXids"

Ah, that explains it.  v5 of the patch is attached.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Jonathan S. Katz
Дата:
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
FAQ