Re: Refactor backup related code (was: Is it correct to say, "invalid data in file \"%s\"", BACKUP_LABEL_FILE in do_pg_backup_stop?)

At Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:03:24 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy  wrote in 
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 1:54 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
>  wrote:
> > What do you think about this?
> 
> -1 from me. We have the function context and the structure name there
> to represent that the parameter name 'state' is actually 'backup
> state'. I don't think we gain anything here. Whenever the BackupState
> is used away from any function, the variable name backup_state is
> used, static variable in xlogfuncs.c

There's no shadowing caused by the change. If we mind the same
variable names between files, we could rename backup_state in
xlogfuncs.c to process_backup_state or session_backup_state.

If this is still unacceptable, I propose to change the comment. (I
found that the previous patch forgets about do_pg_backup_stop())

- * It fills in backup_state with the information required for the backup,
+ * It fills in the parameter "state" with the information required for the backup,

(This is following the notation just above)

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center