Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT
| От | Julien Rouhaud |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20210822122551.f2xyy6vck6efjyee@nol обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 02:17:16PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> Is true, so it increases differences between Windows and Unix, and fixing
> these issues is not fun work. On the other hand, maybe direct access to
> these variables from extensions is an antipattern, and we should use a
> direct function call API and functions current_setting and set_config. The
> overhead is usually not too big.
Yes, and that's what I did for one of my extensions. But that's still a bit of
overhead, and extra burden only seen when trying to have Windows compatiblity,
and I hope I can get rid of that at some point.
If direct variable access shouldn't be possible, then we should explicitly tag
those with __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden"))) or something like that to
have a more consistent behavior.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: