Re: minor doc fix - garbage in example of result of unnest
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: minor doc fix - garbage in example of result of unnest |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200605153811.4m3pnun526ndf6dp@development обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: minor doc fix - garbage in example of result of unnest (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: minor doc fix - garbage in example of result of unnest
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 09:56:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: >> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml >> index 7c06afd3ea..3b810c0eb4 100644 >> --- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml >> +++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml >> @@ -17821,7 +17821,6 @@ SELECT NULLIF(value, '(none)') ... >> 1 >> 2 >> </programlisting> >> - (2 rows in result) >> </para></entry> >> </row> > >That's not "garbage", I put it there intentionally. > Why is it outside the <programlisting> though? Also, the next unnest example does not include the number of rows - why the difference? -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: