Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields
Дата
Msg-id
20200428174557.GA7095@momjian.us
Ответ на
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields (Peter Eisentraut)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-maskfields Arthur Nascimento <tureba@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-maskfields Arthur Nascimento <tureba@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-maskfields Arthur Nascimento <tureba@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-maskfields Arthur Nascimento <tureba@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:14:06PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 2020-04-21 21:08, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > - A record can have one of the seven formats > > + A record can have one of the 11 formats > > I think this sort of thing is a sign that the number should be replaced by > "several". Agreed: - A record can have one of the 11 formats + A record can have several formats: -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата: