Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200406224434.xwkq5cqgo6g2n4gl@development обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 06:34:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 05:51:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Well, it's *less* unhappy. thorntail is showing that the number of >>> workers field is not stable; that will need to be masked. > >> Yeah, I've already pushed a fix for that. But there seems to be another >> failure in th explain output. Looking. > >I'm kind of unimpressed with that fix, because it guarantees that if >there's any problem with more than 2 workers, this test will never >find it. I think you should do what I said and arrange to replace >the number-of-workers output with "N". > I can do that, but isn't this how every other regression test does it? regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: