Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200313180150.fud6yy3pji25hid7@development обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 01:16:44PM -0400, James Coleman wrote: >On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:44 PM Tomas Vondra ><tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >... >> Now, a couple comments about parts 0001 - 0003 of the patch ... >> >> 1) I see a bunch of failures in the regression test, due to minor >> differences in the explain output. All the differences are about minor >> changes in memory usage, like this: >> >> - "Sort Space Used": 30, + >> + "Sort Space Used": 29, + >> >> I'm not sure if it happens on my machine only, but maybe the test is not >> entirely stable. > >make check passes on multiple machines for me; what arch/distro are you using? > Nothing exotic - Fedora on x64. My guess is that things like enabling asserts will make a difference too, because then we track additional stuff for allocated chunks etc. So I agree with Tom trying to keep this stable is a lost cause, essentially. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: