Re: Fetching timeline during recovery
От
Kyotaro Horiguchi
Тема
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery
Дата
Msg-id
20200107.155729.862912880214794758.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery (Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Fetching timeline during recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
At Fri, 3 Jan 2020 16:11:38 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote in > Hi, > > On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 15:38:16 +0100 > Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > [...] > > My idea would be to return a row from pg_stat_get_wal_receiver() as soon as > > a wal receiver has been replicating during the uptime of the standby, no > > matter if there's one currently working or not. If no wal receiver is active, > > the "pid" field would be NULL and the "status" would reports eg. "inactive". > > All other fields would report their last known value as they are kept in > > shared memory WalRcv struct. > > Please, find in attachment a patch implementing the above proposal. At Mon, 23 Dec 2019 15:38:16 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote in > 1. we could decide to remove this filter to expose the data even when no wal > receiver is active. It's the same behavior than pg_stat_subscription view. > It could introduce regression from tools point of view, but adds some > useful information. I would vote 0 for it. A subscription exists since it is defined and regardless whether it is active or not. It is strange that we see a line in the view if replication is not configured. But it is reasonable to show if it is configured. We could do that by checking PrimaryConnInfo. (I would vote +0.5 for it). > 2. we could extend it with new replayed lsn/tli fields. I would vote +1 for > it. +1. As of now a walsender lives for just one timeline, because it ends for disconnection from walsender when the master moves to a new timeline. That being said, we already have the columns for TLI for both starting and received-up-to LSN so we would need it also for replayed LSN for a consistent looking. The function is going to show "streaming" but conninfo is not shown until connection establishes. That state is currently hidden by the PID filtering of the view. We might need to keep the WALRCV_STARTING state until connection establishes. sender_host and sender_port have bogus values until connection is actually established when conninfo is changed. They as well as conninfo should be hidden until connection is established, too, I think. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления