Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSLimplementations

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Michael Paquier
Тема
Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSLimplementations
Дата
в 06:46:12
Msg-id
20180528034612.GB5093@paquier.xyz
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Handling better supported channel binding types for SSLimplementations Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSL implementations Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSLimplementations Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSL implementations Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSLimplementations Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSL implementations Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSLimplementations Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSLimplementations Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSLimplementations Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSLimplementations Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSLimplementations Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:19:55PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Moved to next CF along with those other two patches.

Attached is a refreshed patch for this thread, which failed to apply
after recent changes.  This is tied with patches for other SSL
implementations, so let's see about it later if necessary.
--
Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
FAQ