Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Andres Freund
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node
Дата
Msg-id
20171107193200.5jkjvuhqclcg4bj2@alap3.anarazel.de
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node "Tels" <nospam-pg-abuse@bloodgate.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Ants Aasma <ants.aasma@eesti.ee>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Alexander Kuzmenkov <a.kuzmenkov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node Alexander Kuzmenkov <a.kuzmenkov@postgrespro.ru>
Hi,

On 2017-11-06 10:56:43 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Andres Freund  wrote
> > On 2017-11-05 01:05:59 +0100, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> skip-gather-project-v1.patch does what it says on the tin.  I still
> >> don't have a test case for this, and I didn't find that it helped very
> >> much,
> 
> I am also wondering in which case it can help and I can't think of the
> case.

I'm confused?  Isn't it fairly obvious that unnecessarily projecting
at the gather node is wasteful? Obviously depending on the query you'll
see smaller / bigger gains, but that there's beenfdits should be fairly obvious?


> Basically, as part of projection in the gather, I think we are just
> deforming the tuple which we anyway need to perform before sending the
> tuple to the client (printtup) or probably at the upper level of the
> node.

But in most cases you're not going to print millions of tuples, instead
you're going to apply some further operators ontop (e.g. the
OFFSET/LIMIT in my example).

> >> and you said this looked like a big bottleneck in your
> >> testing, so here you go.

> Is it possible that it shows the bottleneck only for 'explain analyze'
> statement as we don't deform the tuple for that at a later stage?

Doesn't matter, there's a OFFSET/LIMIT ontop of the query. Could just as
well be a sort node or something.


> > The query where that showed a big benefit was
> >
> > SELECT * FROM lineitem WHERE l_suppkey > '5012' OFFSET 1000000000 LIMIT 1;
> >
> > (i.e a not very selective filter, and then just throwing the results away)
> >
> > still shows quite massive benefits:
> 
> Do you see the benefit if the query is executed without using Explain Analyze?

Yes.

Before:
tpch_5[11878][1]=# SELECT * FROM lineitem WHERE l_suppkey > '5012' OFFSET 1000000000 LIMIT 1;^[[A
...
Time: 7590.196 ms (00:07.590)

After:
Time: 3862.955 ms (00:03.863)


Greetings,

Andres Freund


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Jacob Champion
Дата:
От: Dmitry Dolgov
Дата:
FAQ