Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches
От
Stephen Frost
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches
Дата
Msg-id
20170314191549.GV9812@tamriel.snowman.net
Ответ на
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches (Robert Haas)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: logical replication access control patches Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: logical replication access control patches Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Greetings, * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: > However, what I'm not clear about is whether this is a situation > that's likely to come up much in practice. I would have thought that > publications and subscriptions would typically be configured by roles > with quite high levels of privilege anyway, in which case the separate > PUBLISH privilege would rarely be used in practice, and might > therefore fail to be worth using up a bit. I might be missing a > plausible scenario in which that's not the case, though. Right, this is part of my concern also. Further, PUBLISH, as I understand it, is something of a one-time or at least reasonably rarely done operation. This is quite different from a SELECT privilege which is used on every query against the table and which may be GRANT'd to user X today and user Y tomorrow and perhaps REVOKE'd from user X the next day. What happens when the PUBLISH right is REVOKE'd from the user who did the PUBLISH in the first place, for example..? Thanks! Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Pavan Deolasee
Дата:
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата: